Transaction interpretation
Transaction-request decoding, authority scope, destination context and uncertainty presentation around SafeSign and Security Core.
This index tracks research directions that are visible in the repository or directly connected to active product work. A design note is a design note; a source scaffold is a scaffold. Nothing here is called peer-reviewed, audited or published unless there is evidence for that status.
The useful boundary is between an idea, a specification, a prototype and a production capability. These areas are kept visible without collapsing those stages.
Transaction-request decoding, authority scope, destination context and uncertainty presentation around SafeSign and Security Core.
Browser interception boundaries for wallet-provider requests, including page-context wrapping and local-only preference storage in the Guard scaffold.
Bitcoin PSBT preview and route-intelligence concepts, with signing and route execution kept separate from current analysis surfaces.
Security education through transaction labs: approvals, typed data, Permit2, phishing, proxies, simulation divergence and incident-response scenarios.
Public labels are treated as claims. The site therefore uses conservative status language and points readers toward code, documentation and project pages rather than invented paper identifiers.
IDEA — direction under consideration; not an implemented capability.
SPEC / NOTE — documented behavior or design constraint; not automatically peer-reviewed.
SCAFFOLD / PROTOTYPE — code exists, but build, integration or production validation may remain.
PRODUCT SURFACE — visible capability with its trust boundary stated separately from future work.
Every direction should define a threat, hypothesis, test artifact and evidence gate before a stronger public claim is allowed.
Test whether decoded authority materially exceeds the user's stated action.
Model mutable state and conditional paths that can separate benign simulation from real execution.
Quantify lifetime and blast radius of approvals, Permit and Permit2.
Every direction should define a threat, hypothesis, test artifact and evidence gate before a stronger public claim is allowed.
{
"threat":"simulation divergence",
"hypothesis":"mutable execution context can invalidate benign previews",
"artifact":"fixture-suite/simulation-divergence",
"status":"prototype"
}{
"allowed":"prototype demonstrates selected divergence cases",
"notAllowed":["audited","peer-reviewed","complete protection"],
"evidenceRequired":["reproducible tests","independent review"]
}No paper title, audit label or validation claim without an inspectable artifact or independent evidence.